Fritz's World

An exciting and awe-inspiring glimpse into my life: movie reviews (which are replete with spoilers), Penn State football, Washington Nationals, and life here in the nation's capital. Can you handle it?

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

A slightly shortened 395?

While searching WTOP for a news article, I stumbled upon another article that caught my eye: one about how a section of 395 could close permanently in DC.

Apparently it's part of a study aimed at gauging the amount of "through" traffic vs. local traffic, and the segment of 395 being considered for closure is between New York Avenue and Massachusetts Avenue NW. Granted, that's not a very long stretch, but it would be a total disaster if they closed that, because that would only leave one other option for accessing Route 50 or 295: crossing the Sousa Bridge and making that god-awful left turn from Pennsylvania Avenue SE onto 295 northbound. (Taking South Capitol Street to Howard Road is also an option, but not an ideal one during a Nats home game.)

I was a little surprised by the rationale given for such a road closure.
Karyn LeBlanc, spokesperson for DDOT, says the road isn't closing down just yet.

"DDOT often takes an opportunity during various EIS studies to look at a variety of possible options and ideas that may or may not impact traffic throughout the region," says LeBlanc.

"The purpose of this study is to investigate and recommend ways to reduce congestion, improve traffic operations and enhance safety in the corridor."

The I-395 study should be completed in two or three months, according to the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.

"We are going to be looking at (the closure) as an option," says Kirby. "But if you were to close that off, it would have a very significant impact."
Well, duh!!! You'd be closing off the biggest thru-way into the District from Maryland! Closing that spot of 395 would not decrease traffic; it would make it soar, because you'd have a lot of angry drivers looking for alternate routes. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that you don't reduce congestion by closing off a major thoroughfare like that. You build something that would accommodate the traffic volume. As it stands right now, taking New York Avenue down to the intersection with 395 is the best choice we have for an "interstate" highway crossing the District (or at least one that would connect like 95 should).

I say keep that stretch of 395 connecting to New York Avenue open. Closing that spot down would be an utterly disastrous idea.

Labels:

Will The Dude live long and prosper?

This is what you get when you combine the following elements: downtime at work, Adobe Photoshop, a love for Star Trek and The Big Lebowski, and twisted creativity.

Labels: ,

Monday, June 23, 2008

George Carlin has died!

I honestly couldn't believe it when I saw the news this morning, but comedian George Carlin has died.

Sadly, I can't honor him with a YouTube clip of his hilarious cameo in Dogma, or as one of the ex-hippies who helped Homer discover his middle name on The Simpsons, but still, godspeed to you, George! Your unique blend of comedy will be greatly missed.

Labels:

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Lost Highway (revisited)

On the IMDb trivia page for Lost Highway, there's an entry that reads, "In a recent interview, director [David] Lynch confessed that Lost Highway and Twin Peaks take place in the same world." I recently had the chance to watch the early-90s TV series Twin Peaks, which was helmed by David Lynch, and when viewing Lost Highway through the lens of Twin Peaks and the world therein, suddenly Lost Highway begins to make a frightening amount of sense!!!

Though there's still enough ambiguity left over that we can't entirely patch the whole Lost Highway narrative up neat and tidy. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, given that this is a David Lynch film—and by definition, his movies are about as abstract as can be. But all the same, it's often a lot of fun trying to piece together his movies and somehow making sense of the mess . . . yet it's equally as fun just allowing yourself to get caught up in the fascinating, brilliantly nonconformist narrative without needing to figure it out. Just allowing yourself to be taken for the ride, as it were.

But Lost Highway in particular presents a very challenging base for interpretation, because it goes in such unanticipated directions that it almost seems like it's meant to not be figured out. That it's meant to be completely indecipherable. Therein lies the charm of Lost Highway, and it was from this premise that I originally reviewed the film last year.

But again, with Twin Peaks now serving as the Rosetta Stone for further viewing, the premise behind Lost Highway becomes shockingly and almost refreshingly clear.

Let's examine Twin Peaks first. The bulk of the series (which spanned only two seasons on TV) involves the investigation into the murder of high-schooler Laura Palmer in the small Pacific Northwest town of Twin Peaks. Though the real crux of Twin Peaks only became clear towards the end of the series: that the town and the surrounding woods were haunted by the fabled Black Lodge, a place that can really only be likened to Hell. The inhabitants of the Black Lodge are the purest embodiment of evil, and many of these spirits have the power to possess the minds of people living in this world. In Twin Peaks, it was the spirit of Bob possessing Leland Palmer all throughout his life, up to the point where Bob took over Leland's body and soul to kill his daughter, Laura.

These two points are key to understanding Lost Highway, because we have two identical visages in Lost Highway: the Mystery Man, and the "lost highway" itself.

The Mystery Man could be likened to Bob from Twin Peaks—the evil spirit residing in the Black Lodge who takes control of souls in this world, but only when invited. And the lost highway, in particular the late-night scenes of driving down an abandoned superhighway, could itself be the Black Lodge. And the late-night desert and cabin that Alice Wakefield takes Pete Dayton to are inside the lost highway/Black Lodge, much like the Red Room is inside the Black Lodge in Twin Peaks.

Like Bob, the Mystery Man only possesses souls who personally invite them into their minds. In Twin Peaks, Leland Palmer invited Bob into his mind at a terribly young age, and Bob continued to haunt and possess Leland for the rest of his life. In Lost Highway, when Fred Madison demands to know how Mystery Man got into Fred's house (when they meet at Andy's party), Mystery Man's response was, "You invited me. It is not my custom to go where I am not wanted." In both cases, the invitation of Black Lodge inhabitants into their souls either resulted or came as a direct result of the desire to do murder—Leland murdering Laura while under Bob's possession, and Fred secretly desiring to murder Renee over her infidelity with Dick Laurant and Andy.

Unlike Bob's possession of Leland Palmer, though, I think that when Mystery Man possesses Fred, you physically see both men together. Remember how, the night Renee is murdered, she calls uneasily into the dark hallway, "Fred, where are you?" From there we cut to the dark living room, only to see not one but two shadows silhouetted along the wall, walking through the dark house. And then again when Mystery Man and Fred execute Dick Laurant in the desert, both men are there. (This would also explain how, when both Fred and Pete Dayton look in the mirror, they only see themselves, whereas Leland Palmer would see Bob in the mirror.) But much like Bob's possession of Leland Palmer, Fred likewise doesn't remember his activities during his possession. Which would explain his puzzlement at the intercom message, "Dick Laurant is dead", as well as his inability to contemplate how he killed Renee.

So with these two key points, I think Lost Highway progresses much like this (and I'm working from the progression of the movie, rather than from a linear timeline).

Many of the beginning scenes illustrate the marital tension between Fred and Renee, as well as Fred's growing anxieties about her possibly cheating on him—such as her not coming to any of his jazz gigs, her not answering the phone when Fred's out, or Fred seeing her walk through the crowd with Andy at another gig. To say nothing of the uncomfortable and detached sex they have one night, which ended up being crippled for several reasons: 1) Fred's anxieties got to him, 2) Fred briefly saw Mystery Man's face in place of Renee's, and 3) Fred actually envisions Renee being murdered in her bed.

This could possibly be the moment when Fred invites Mystery Man into his subconscious.

Because after this, Renee begins to find videotapes from an anonymous sender left outside their front door. These tapes show exterior shots of the house, but progressively get more private and personal by showing Fred and Renee sleeping in their bed together . . . and ultimately, a blood-soaked Fred kneeling over Renee's mutilated body. When viewing these videotapes through the Twin Peaks filter, these videotapes could be interpreted as harbingers of death—much like Sarah Palmer had a vision of a white horse every time a family member was about to die in Twin Peaks.

When Fred is in jail for Renee's murder, he spends all his time obsessing about how he could have possibly killed Renee. Hence, all his headaches and his inability to sleep. When he looks to the side of his jail cell the one night and sees the cabin burning in reverse progression, I believe he is glimpsing an entry into the Black Lodge. Further to that, his sizzling convulsions on his bunk could signify his being sucked into the Black Lodge, where he's doomed to stay forever.

The transition scene of him driving down the deserted highway at night . . . again, I believe that the "lost highway" itself is the Black Lodge, and when Fred pulls over to the side of the road and encounters Pete Dayton for the first time, this is illustrating Pete's transport from his own world into Fred's jail cell. Notice how Sheila is calling frantically for him to come back, and how Pete's father runs after him as if Pete were in danger, because of the white lightning surrounding Pete. This scene is often referred to as "that night" in Pete Dayton's linear progression, and in Twin Peaks, white lightning often symbolized entry into the Black Lodge.

At this point, I should state that I believe Pete Dayton is a real person—not a figment of Fred Madison's imagination, like so many of us have believed. And Pete's disappearance was genuine, if only temporary. Remember how people like Arnie, Sheila, and Pete's friends are happy to see Pete back in this world after being gone for a while. But this brings about another important element of Lost Highway, which is to say, the purpose of Pete Dayton in the story. I believe that Pete is brought in to complete the murders that Fred started but couldn't finish (because he's in jail), and I don't believe a doppelganger is capable of committing murder. While in the possession of Mystery Man, Fred was able to murder Dick Laurant (which I'll get to later) and Renee, but he wasn't able to take care of Andy.

This is where Pete Dayton comes in, because soon after Pete begins working at Arnie's garage again, he meets up with Mr. Eddy and Alice Wakefield . . . each of whom would be doppelgangers of their real-world counterparts (Dick Laurant and Renee, respectively). Remember how Dale Cooper returned to the world from the Black Lodge in the final episode of Twin Peaks? That was his doppelganger (his double, if you will), with the real Dale Cooper still trapped in the Black Lodge.

With Alice Wakefield serving as the doppelganger of Renee, naturally their lives will parallel each other magnificently (think of her relationship to Andy, her porn background and the porn tapes with Renee and Marilyn Manson at Andy's house, and the very telling photo of both real Renee and doppelganger Alice). But her real purpose is to manipulate Pete into killing Andy. And when Pete and Alice escape from Andy's house and drive to the cabin in the desert . . . this is really them entering the lost highway/Black Lodge.

Alice's final line, "You'll never have me", after sex with Pete in the desert is indicative of Alice being Renee's doppelganger, only to disappear into Black Lodge oblivion when entering the cabin. And thus the Mystery Man re-enters the scene, showing his video camera and shouting, "What the fuck is your name?" The fact that Fred Madison re-emerges instead of Pete is really irrelevant, because by now, both men are trapped inside the Black Lodge forever.

The remainder of the film, however, could be interpreted as flashbacks, or visions of when Fred (under the possession of Mystery Man) kills Dick Laurant after his liaise with Renee at the Lost Highway Hotel. This is actually the first time Fred is possessed by Mystery Man, and again, you can recognize his possession because you see both men together. And later, when the black Mercedes pulls up to Fred's house, it isn't Fred himself who returns to his own house to announce, "Dick Laurant is dead." It's his doppelganger, his Black Lodge-created double. The real Fred is the one who answers the page, the one who was sitting alone in his house early in the morning during the film's opening shot.

During the police chase the follows, Fred's doppelganger goes through the white flashes and convulsions that symbolize his shifting through the Black Lodge to another time and place . . . this one being the unpossessed Fred being struck in the face by the one cop who shouts, "Sit down, killer!" And then we have the confused, inexplicable Fred unable to believe that he's possibly just killed his wife.

And the final parallel between Lost Highway and Twin Peaks: the ever-famous red curtains! We see red curtains in the bedroom of Fred and Renee's house . . . and in Twin Peaks, the red curtains symbolize the entrance to the Black Lodge! More of a symbolic send-up to Twin Peaks, but a necessary one nevertheless.

Labels:

Monday, June 09, 2008

A momentary brush with Hollywood?

On Saturday, my father was in town to visit, and we paid our first visit to the Udvar-Hazy Museum (i.e., the Dulles wing of the Air and Space Museum) in close to five years. I'd been eager to visit that museum again because, with exhibits like the Enola Gay and the space shuttle Enterprise, I find the Udvar-Hazy wing to be far superior to the main Air and Space Museum on the National Mall.

When we arrived, the first thing I noticed was a long line of people gathered by the main stairwell leading down to the main floor. Then I noticed that it wasn't a line per se, but merely onlookers, because there was a film crew gathered by the SR-71 spy plane. The security guards nearby were enforcing photography restrictions and had roped off a good portion of the main floor, and I overheard someone saying something about a documentary being filmed. So I proceeded to push thoughts of the film crew from my mind and went about gazing at the other planes and exhibits elsewhere in the museum.

I was disappointed, though, because I had really wanted to get some pictures of the space shuttle Enterprise, and the film crew had blocked off access to that hangar.

A few hours later, when my father and I went back to the main floor where the film crew had originally been stationed, I was disappointed to find them still there filming (I had been hoping they had finished for the day so we could go into the shuttle hangar). Someone nearby then asked the security guard what was being filmed, and his answer caught me off-guard: Transformers 2. When I heard this, I wasn't sure if he was being honest or just egging us on (because I know that sometimes directors keep a very strict hush-hush about films being made), so I checked IMDb when I got home, and sure enough, Michael Bay is in fact directing a sequel to his live-action Transformers movie, with the working title Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen.

Which leads me to wonder, is the SR-71 spy plane at Udvar-Hazy really a Decepticon?

Labels: ,

Friday, June 06, 2008

A Potomac Yards Metro stop?

It would appear that Metro is considering adding a stop on the Yellow Line, one for Potomac Yards in Alexandria.

I think this would definitely be a great idea, for drivers and shoppers alike! For starters, it would cut down traffic on Route 1. Because as anyone who's driven to Potomac Yards can tell you, traffic in and out of the complex can be rather irksome—let alone trying to make your way around the parking lot!!! Metro would provide an alternative method, particularly for DC and Alexandria residents, to come shop at Potomac Yards and not have to drive.

On the flip side, however, I can see people doing like they would at the Pentagon City Mall—parking in the mall parking garage, and then hopping on the Metro into DC. Hopefully that won't prove to be a problem at Potomac Yards, as it hasn't yet proven to be one at Pentagon City.

The only stipulations I would put on Metro coming to Potomac Yards is that the shopping center would need to build a rear entrance to the complex, as Metro riders getting off here would otherwise be greeted by the beautiful sight of . . . the service entrances to Barnes & Noble. The other stipulation is that Metrobus service not be provided here, as it would conflict too greatly with evening shopping traffic. Beyond that, I say bring Metro to Potomac Yards!

Labels: ,

Thursday, June 05, 2008

A Star Trek wedding (of sorts)

With California's recent legalization of same-sex marriages, guess who's decided to tie the knot? George Takei, better known as the helmsman Sulu on Star Trek. Takei came out a few years ago, even though it appears he and his partner have been living together for 21 years. And since Star Trek is the series he's most known for as an actor, naturally he and the other cast members are playing it up.
Walter Koenig, who played Chekov in "Star Trek," will be the best man and Nichelle Nichols, who played Uhura, will be the matron of honor. Castmate Leonard Nimoy will be among the 200 guests, but probably not William Shatner. Takei has said Shatner didn't treat him and most of the cast very well.
The ceremony is set for stardate September 14.

Labels:

Monday, June 02, 2008

Blu-ray still overshadowed by standard DVD

Since the start of the HD-DVD/Blu-ray war, I've consistently been arguing that standard DVD remains a worthy and acceptable medium—and now that Blu-ray has won the aforementioned war, I still maintain this stance.

But it appears that others are sharing my view, too, though for different reasons. For many, it's a matter of money—i.e., a Blu-ray player is simply too expensive at nearly $400 a pop. For others, it's the greater availability of movies and TV shows that are only available in standard DVD. Plus, the market demographics themselves present a number of obstacles.

The format also faces sales challenges that DVDs did not when they took over from VHS in the late 1990s. It doesn't save any space compared with DVD, and there's no need to replace a DVD collection once you buy a Blu-ray player because it will play your old discs.

There also is a proliferation of direct-to-home offerings appearing on cable, satellite and the Internet that threaten to stop Blu-ray growth in its tracks. Blu-ray backers say, however, consumers prefer physical copies of movies over virtual ones, especially when some online rental services impose a time limit.
The overall consensus is that, if Blu-ray ever were to dominate over standard DVD, it won't be for a few years yet. Doesn't bother me, any, because as I've stated many times before, standard DVD is good enough for me.

Labels:

Powered by Blogger